You what?!
I've now had three weeks worth of Systematic Theology seminars and I've yet to understand a flamin' thing?! Questions abound - not least will I ever get it?!
After all, 'was Origen's hermenteutical use of allegorical writing really non-esoteric?'
Or is it really 'a false dichotomy or overly simplistic to polarise Pseudo-Dionysius's apophatic and catophatic assertions?' Is it 'an either or or both?'
Still it could be worse. I mean I could find that what I've got to read - in order to understand what on earth is going on in the 'classroom' - was similarly opaque...
Exhibit 'A' (taken from the Mr Dionysius' gripping Mystical Theology - essential course reading!)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0e90/c0e90f4c583b2b0702c5fd4e916863bf044506a7" alt=""
Ah, of course, that clears things up nicely - I couldn't agree more?!